IS

Davison, Robert M.

Topic Weight Topic Terms
0.394 communication media computer-mediated e-mail richness electronic cmc mail medium message performance convergence used communications messages
0.335 action research engagement principles model literature actions focus provides developed process emerging establish field build
0.245 team teams virtual members communication distributed performance global role task cognition develop technology involved time
0.206 research information systems science field discipline researchers principles practice core methods area reference relevance conclude
0.196 collaborative groups feedback group work collective individuals higher effects efficacy perceived tasks members environment writing
0.173 outcomes theory nature interaction theoretical paradox versus interpersonal literature provides individual levels understanding dimensions addition
0.166 online uncertainty reputation sellers buyers seller marketplaces markets marketplace buyer price signaling auctions market premiums
0.158 relationships relationship relational information interfirm level exchange relations perspective model paper interpersonal expertise theory study
0.135 research journals journal information systems articles academic published business mis faculty discipline analysis publication management
0.132 explanations explanation bias use kbs biases facilities cognitive making judgment decisions likely decision important prior
0.126 validity reliability measure constructs construct study research measures used scale development nomological scales instrument measurement
0.109 theory theories theoretical paper new understanding work practical explain empirical contribution phenomenon literature second implications
0.109 framework model used conceptual proposed given particular general concept frameworks literature developed develop providing paper
0.108 characteristics experience systems study prior effective complexity deal reveals influenced companies type analyze having basis
0.105 research studies issues researchers scientific methodological article conducting conduct advanced rigor researcher methodology practitioner issue

Focal Researcher     Coauthors of Focal Researcher (1st degree)     Coauthors of Coauthors (2nd degree)

Note: click on a node to go to a researcher's profile page. Drag a node to reallocate. Number on the edge is the number of co-authorships.

Ou, Carol X. J. 2 Fuller, Mark A. 1 HARDIN, ANDREW M. 1 Kock, Ned 1
Martinsons, Maris G. 1 Pavlou, Paul A. 1
committees 1 community 1 Canonical action research 1 culture 1
collective efficacy 1 computer-mediated communication (CMC) technologies 1 computer-mediated communication interactivity model (CMCIM) 1 Ethics 1
focal theory 1 global virtual teams 1 Guanxi 1 information systems research 1
instrumental theory 1 instant messenger (IM) 1 interactivity 1 knowledge management 1
knowledge sharing 1 media synchronicity theory (MST) 1 organizational change 1 online marketplaces 1
plagiarism 1 principles and criteria 1 presence 1 swift guanxi 1
trust 1 virtual team efficacy 1 virtual teams 1

Articles (4)

Swift Guanxi in Online Marketplaces: The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication Technologies (MIS Quarterly, 2014)
Authors: Abstract:
    The concept of guanxi (i.e., a close and pervasive interpersonal relationship) has received little attention in the literature on online marketplaces, perhaps due to their impersonal nature. However, we propose that computer-mediated communication (CMC) technologies can mimic traditional interactive face-to-face communications, thus enabling a form of guanxi in online marketplaces. Extending the literature on traditional guanxi, we herein introduce the concept of swift guanxi, conceptualized as the buyer’s perception of a swiftly formed interpersonal relationship with a seller, which consists of mutual understanding, reciprocal favors, and relationship harmony.
THE ROLES OF THEORY IN CANONICAL ACTION RESEARCH. (MIS Quarterly, 2012)
Authors: Abstract:
    Canonical action research (CAR) aims to address real-world problems and improve organizational performance by combining scholarly observations with practical interventions. However, efforts to conduct CAR have revealed challenges that reflect a significant research-practice gap. We examine these challenges by revisiting the process, principles, and criteria of CAR developed earlier. The specific roles of two different types of theory in the cyclical action research process are considered. A project undertaken in two public relations firms illustrates how our methodological revision improves the rigor and quality of CAR. This article contributes both a significantly enhanced action research method, with detailed guidelines and suggestions that emphasize the roles of focal and instrumental theories, and an emerging theory of knowledge sharing that incorporates key elements of Chinese management and culture.
Efficacy in Technology-Mediated Distributed Teams. (Journal of Management Information Systems, 2006)
Authors: Abstract:
    The concept of collective efficacy within virtual teams has yet to be studied. This study developed and rigorously validated a domain-specific measure of collective efficacy, entitled virtual team efficacy, within a comprehensive research framework. Over a two-year period we collected field study data from multiple samples of information systems project teams--in all, 52 virtual teams comprising 318 students from the United States, Great Britain, and Hong Kong. As we hypothesized, group potency and computer collective efficacy act as antecedents to virtual team efficacy, and virtual team efficacy is in turn predictive of perceptual and objective measures of performance. Further, consistent with efficacy theory, we also find that virtual team efficacy acts on performance outcomes through specific mediating processes. This paper contributes to the academic and practitioner communities by providing a comprehensive model of virtual team efficacy and performance and by providing validated instrumentation that can be immediately applied during further research in this area.
DEALING WITH PLAGIARISM IN THE INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH COMMUNITY: A LOOK AT FACTORS THAT DRIVE PLAGIARISM AND WAYS TO ADDRESS THEM. (MIS Quarterly, 2003)
Authors: Abstract:
    Imagine yourself spending years conducting a research project and having it published as an article in a refereed journal, only to see a plagiarized copy of the article later published in another journal. Then imagine yourself being left to fight for your rights alone, and eventually finding out that it would be very difficult to hold the plagiarist accountable for what he or she did. The recent decision by the Association of Information Systems to create a standing committee on member misconduct suggests that while this type of situation may sound outrageous, it is likely to become uncomfortably frequent in the information systems research community if proper measures are not taken by a community-backed organization. In this article, we discuss factors that can drive plagiarism, as well as potential measures to prevent it. Our goal is to discuss alternative ways in which plagiarism can be prevented and dealt with when it arises. We hope to start a debate that provides the basis on which broader mechanisms to deal with plagiarism can be established, which we envision as being associated with and complementary to the committee created by the Association for Information Systems.